Case Study: A11yAuditor.io

A free WCAG 2.2 Level A scan designed for fast triage — prioritised findings, practical fixes, and repeatable release gating.

A11yAuditor.io

Independent tool • Research & development

Published:

A free WCAG 2.2 Level A scan designed for fast triage: enter a URL, get a prioritised report, and act on the highest-impact issues first. Use it as a lightweight gate before deeper manual audit and remediation planning.

This case study reflects our approach to AI governance and quality engineering, detailed in our Services.

Note: This is an independent tool. Not client work.

Screenshot of the A11yAuditor.io WCAG 2.2 Level A scan interface
Enter a URL, run the scan, and review prioritised findings mapped to WCAG 2.2 Level A criteria.

Why we developed it

Most organisations don’t fail accessibility because they’re malicious — they fail because delivery moves fast, ownership is fragmented, and “we’ll fix it later” becomes permanent. Teams need a fast, defensible signal that catches obvious issues early, before they ship exclusion into production.

A11yAuditor.io exists to make that early signal cheap and immediate. It’s deliberately scoped to Level A so teams can baseline quickly, stop the bleeding, and then do the real work: deeper audit, remediation, regression proof, and governance controls.

What this tool is trying to achieve

  • Fast accessibility triage for delivery teams
  • Prioritised fixes that reduce user harm
  • Clear, explainable findings mapped to WCAG criteria

How to use the scan

  1. Enter the page URL into the scanner.
  2. Run the scan and wait for the report to generate.
  3. Start with the top-priority items: issues that block navigation, meaning, or interaction.
  4. Fix, re-scan, and treat it as a repeatable pre-release check.

Tip: Automated scanning is a fast gate — not conformance proof. Use it to catch obvious failures early, then back it with manual testing.

Design intent

What the tool does

  • Runs a lightweight, URL-based scan aligned to WCAG 2.2 Level A
  • Surfaces prioritised issues with practical remediation guidance
  • Helps teams triage risk early and repeatedly
  • Supports governance-led release gating (evidence beats reassurance)

What it deliberately does not do

  • Claim full compliance or legal/standards conformance
  • Replace manual testing with assistive tech
  • Guarantee coverage of every failure mode (automation never does)
  • Pretend accessibility is solved by a report

Privacy & data handling

The scan is initiated from a URL you provide. The tool is designed to minimise data exposure by not requiring accounts, logins, or user-provided personal information to run a report.

  • No account required
  • No need to upload documents or user data
  • Designed for quick triage without unnecessary collection

What this shows in practice

This project demonstrates how Xyphos treats accessibility as a delivery control — not a UX clean-up. In regulated contexts, you don’t get to hand-wave. You need repeatable checks, clear evidence, and release discipline.

  • Risk-based triage (fix what blocks users first)
  • Governance-led delivery (evidence as the default)
  • Practical tooling that supports real delivery constraints

Research & references

Want governance-led delivery that holds up under scrutiny?

If you're operating in a regulated or high-risk environment and need practical controls, assurance, and delivery discipline, let's talk.